Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4800MQ outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4800MQ is 41 days older than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4800MQ
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Core i3-3250 - 179 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 47 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-4800MQ
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4800MQ | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
47 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
