Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4790 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4790 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4790.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$144.0 vs CA$1180.39
- Up to 87% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - CA$0.83 vs CA$6.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-4790 - 179 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
173
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$144
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$144 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13193 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.59/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$1180.39
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,180.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4790 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |