Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4785T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4785T is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than FX-8300 - 265 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-4785T - CA$83.46 vs CA$196.3
- Up to 55% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-4785T - CA$0.33 vs CA$0.74 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
265
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$196.3
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4785T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |