Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 2605 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 37 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-4702MQ - 424 vs 393 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 128 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
424
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$7600
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$7,600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4702MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 64 |
8 | Threads | 128 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |