Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2605 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 37 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i7-4702MQ - 280 vs 265 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 64 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
280
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$4888.78
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$4,888.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4702MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |