Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i7-4700MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1415 days newer than Core i7-4700MQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700MQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-4700MQ - 318 vs 308 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
318
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700MQ | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |