Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-4700HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2530 days newer than Core i7-4700HQ.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4700HQ
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 47 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4700HQ - 188 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4700HQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4700HQ | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
May 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |