Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4600M outperforms Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4600M is 1625 days older than Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 2200G - 165 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 37 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
164
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |