Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2792 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3930K - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$133.26 vs CA$384.5
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-3930K - CA$0.89 vs CA$2.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$384.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4232 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.26
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |