Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Core i7-3840QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3676 days newer than Core i7-3840QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3840QM
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3840QM - 199 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3840QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$629
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$629 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7443 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3840QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |