Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-3820QM - 106 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3820QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |