Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-3820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1950 days newer than Core i7-3820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3820QM - 254 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
254
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$303.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$303.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 44037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
629
53.8527397260274%
Multi-Core
2147
37.05557473248188%
Intel Core i7-3820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |