Buy on Amazon
CA$350
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 113 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - CA$33.99 vs CA$350.0
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 51 vs 77 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i7-3770K Quad-Core Processor 3.5 GHz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I73770K
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$33.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
82.17821782178217%
Multi-Core
992
40.17820980153908%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
