Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - CA$180.0 vs CA$388.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - CA$1.12 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-3770 - 181 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 20 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
160
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$180
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.14/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$388
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |