Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3867 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3667U - 193 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3667U - 24 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-3667U
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Core i7-13700
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i7-13700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
