Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3630QM outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3630QM is 708 days older than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3630QM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 45 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 30th, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3630QM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 30th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 135 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |