Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700F

Core i7-3540M vs Core i7-10700F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F

2.9 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13582 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i7-10700F

2.9 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13582 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-3540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2669 days newer than Core i7-3540M.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-3540M

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F

  • Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-3540M - 124 vs 112 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3540M - 16 vs 4 threads
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Core i7-3540M Logo
Core i7-3540M

Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013


FPS

112

90%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

124

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$3.58/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$444.48

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel® Core™ i7-10700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 13582 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

Intel Core i7-3540M Logo
Core i7-3540M

Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-3540M Logo
Core i7-3540M

Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013


Single-Core

555

34%

Multi-Core

1114

15%

Intel Core i7-10700F Logo
Core i7-10700F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1612

100%

Multi-Core

7231

100%

Intel Core i7-3540M Logo

Intel Core i7-3540M

vs
Intel Core i7-10700F Logo

Intel Core i7-10700F

Jan 8th, 2013Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7CollectionCore i7
Ivy BridgeCodenameComet Lake
Intel Socket G2 (988B)SocketIntel Socket 1200
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
8
4Threads
16
3.0 GHz
Base Clock Speed2.9 GHz
3.7 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.8 GHz
35 W
TDP65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
30.0x
Multiplier29.0x
Intel HD 4000
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Core i7-3540M or Core i7-10700F

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.