Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 2329 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-3520M - 260 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3520M - 8 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
260
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$458.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$458.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |