Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Core i7-3520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1950 days newer than Core i7-3520M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3520M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 8% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-3520M - 244 vs 226 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$63.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
568
45.622489959839356%
Multi-Core
1152
33.83259911894273%
Intel Core i7-3520M | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |