Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1731 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i7-2960XM - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
255
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |