Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1344 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 55 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-2920XM - 125 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 24 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |