Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 3211 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-2920XM - 218 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 20 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
384
24.36548223350254%
Multi-Core
1269
13.54177782520542%
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |