Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3473 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 7% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i7-2920XM - 207 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 24 vs 8 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$600 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
384
22.209369577790632%
Multi-Core
1269
12.652043868394816%
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |