Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600T outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14600T is 4509 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600T
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-2860QM - 155 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 20 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i5-14600T
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
560
21.521906225980015%
Multi-Core
1670
11.164594197085172%
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i5-14600T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
