Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Core i7-2860QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3775 days newer than Core i7-2860QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2860QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-12400 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 44% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-2860QM - 658 vs 456 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2860QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2860QM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2860QM | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
