Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3123 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-2675QM - 135 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$349.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$349.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |