Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3123 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 217% better in League of Legends than Core i7-2675QM - 171 vs 54 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 12 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$134.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$134.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |