Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 2008 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Core i7-2675QM - 180 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2675QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |