Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2564 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-2670QM - 133 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2670QM - 28 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2670QM
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Single-Core
462
31.665524331734062%
Multi-Core
1450
13.508477734302218%
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
