Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Core i7-2670QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2929 days newer than Core i7-2670QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2670QM
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 45 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 70% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-2670QM - 401 vs 236 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2670QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
401
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1116.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,116.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2670QM | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |