Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 3032 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-2635QM - 228 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 16 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
228
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$659.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$659.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |