Buy on Amazon
CA$564.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4384 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 21% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-2635QM - 329 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2635QM - 32 vs 8 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for CA$564.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65633 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2635QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-2635QM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
449
16.446886446886445%
Multi-Core
1416
8.223474069342005%
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.