Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$210.49 vs CA$852.02
- Up to 70% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-14900F - CA$1.28 vs CA$4.26 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 21% better in God of War than Core i7-2600K - 200 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 32 vs 8 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
165
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$210.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$210.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
200
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.26/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$852.02
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$852.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 195 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |