Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600 is 2641 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 8% cheaper than Core i7-2600 - CA$108.0 vs CA$117.91
- Up to 8% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-2600 - CA$0.91 vs CA$0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
91.91919191919192%
Price, CA$
CA$117.91
91%
Buy for CA$117.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1720 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$108
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1726 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |