Buy on Amazon
CA$285.74
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $384
Availability
MSRP in USD: $384
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700T outperforms Core i5-11600KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700T is 659 days newer than Core i5-11600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700T
- Performs up to 3% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-11600KF - 199 vs 193 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$285.74
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for CA$285.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-13700T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-13700T or Core i5-11600KF
No Man's Sky, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
108 FPS
CA$25.05/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i5-11600KF
16 GB, 500 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$2,705.19
In Stock
108 FPS
CA$28.81/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060
Core i5-11600KF
16 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$3,110.97
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
