Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2724 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 32% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-4160 - 682 vs 516 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
682
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |