Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 37% better in Minecraft than FX-4300 - 821 vs 598 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - CA$36.09 vs CA$339.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-12700F - CA$0.06 vs CA$0.41 per FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
821
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$339
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13779 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
598
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |