Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 21% better in Ready or Not than FX-8350 - 285 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - CA$182.45 vs CA$386.61
- Up to 43% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i7-11700F - CA$0.78 vs CA$1.36 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
285
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.36/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$386.61
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$386.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
235
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |