Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10850H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10850H is 1382 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10850H
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 189 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-10850H
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10850H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
