Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10750H outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10750H is 2033 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10750H
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10750H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |