Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-10700KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$360.0 vs CA$852.02
- Up to 53% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i9-14900F - CA$2.0 vs CA$4.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-10700KF - 199 vs 180 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$360
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$360 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.28/FPS
46%
Price, CA$
CA$852.02
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$852.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |