Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-4670 - 193 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - CA$128.63 vs CA$442.3
- Up to 69% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700KF - CA$0.71 vs CA$2.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.29/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$442.3
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$442.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
182
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |