Buy on Amazon
CA$330
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $303
Availability
MSRP in USD: $303
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4785T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4785T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4785T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-4785T - 82 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4785T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4785T
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - CA$196.3 vs CA$330.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-10700K - CA$2.89 vs CA$4.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
82
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.02/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$330
59%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-10700K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.1 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W (BX8070110700K)
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18589 minutes ago
Core i7-4785T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
68
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$196.3
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-4785T CPU Used 4-Core 8-Thread Desktop Processor 2.2 GHz 8M 35W LGA1150
Buy for CA$196.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18590 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-4785T
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i7-4785T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
