Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7840HS is 1001 days newer than Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
- Performs up to 11% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - 150 vs 135 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
67.50418760469012%
Multi-Core
7231
64.62019660411082%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | No |