Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 244 vs 240 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - CA$153.99 vs CA$378.88
- Up to 59% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700 - CA$0.64 vs CA$1.55 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.55/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$378.88
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
240
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |