Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i5-9500T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 185 days newer than Core i5-9500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9500T - 105 vs 104 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9500T - 24 vs 6 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1149.12
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,149.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1238
97.17425431711146%
Multi-Core
4204
56.39924872551651%
Intel Core i5-9500T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |