Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 3409 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-860 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |