Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 98 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 131 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$179.13 vs CA$1791.28
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 48 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$179.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
129
98.47328244274809%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1791.28
10%
Buy for CA$1,791.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1235
89.62264150943396%
Multi-Core
7407
100%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 48 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |