Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400 is 435 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 4% better in New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 114 vs 110 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$200.0 vs CA$369.9
- Up to 48% better value when playing New World than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$1.75 vs CA$3.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 24 vs 6 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
110
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.36/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$369.9
54%
Buy for CA$369.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |