Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 3 3200G - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - CA$142.95 vs CA$204.0
- Up to 29% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-9400 - CA$0.96 vs CA$1.35 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
151
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.35/FPS
71%
Price, CA$
CA$204
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$204 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |